Flash Header

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

Absorbing Vs. Blocking Sound

by Acoustics By Design on January 29, 2009

It’s time for another semester, and I tell my architecture students that if there’s one thing they learn in my acoustics class, it’s that porous absorbers do not block sound.  A porous sound absorber, by definition, has many tiny interconnected voids that sound travels through.  Fiberglass and open cell foam are examples.  The sound wave loses its energy through friction between the air particles and the fibers/void walls of the material it is passing through.

If a sound wave can pass into a material, it can also pass through a material, and therefore cannot effectively block sound.  Heavy massive materials, in a relative sense, are used for blocking sound, such as gypsum board and concrete block in the building industry.

Sound absorbers are used to reduce sound within a space.  They can reduce the reverberation time, echoes, or prevent the focusing of sound that is reflected from curved surfaces.

So why does batt insulation inside a gypsum board partition improve its sound blocking capabilities?  Because sound that gets through the first layer of gypsum board can be reduced further by absorbing some of its energy before it is able to get through the second layer of gypsum board.  The batt insulation is still acting as a sound absorber, not a sound blocker.

The most egregious violation of this principle that I see in the field is the use of fiberglass batt in an attempt to block low frequency sound coming from a roof top air handling unit through ceiling tiles to the space below.  We often get called to a job site after this has been done and the project personnel have discovered that fiberglass batt insulation is not effective in absorbing (much less blocking) this frequency range.

It is common that fiberglass is laid around the perimeter of private offices in an attempt to block sound from one office to another.  While there is some benefit from this (about 3-5 dB of reduction), the fiberglass is working to absorb sound in the plenum, but it doesn’t block it.  You can “block” enough sound from office to office by stacking a 4 foot width of fiberglass above the wall from the top of wall to the underside of the deck.  Wouldn’t it have been easier just to carry that sound blocking gypsum board to the ceiling instead?

Acoustics By Design

Acoustics By Design

Acoustics By Design consultants provide acoustical consulting services to architects, engineers, facility directors, municipalities, and building owners. Our team includes acoustical consultants, acoustical engineers, noise consultants, and vibration consultants. Our firm also includes an integrated team of audio-visual consultants who design audio, video, theatrical lighting, and technical systems and integrate them with the native acoustical environment.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
TwitterFacebook

Russell May 9, 2014 at 9:05 am

So what type of material would you recommend for sound reduction in a home. I’m trying to deaden the sounds of kids fighting, mom yelling, etc… while sleeping during the day to work at night

Brian Atkinson Brian Atkinson June 19, 2014 at 8:50 am

Oh – a very common concern in residential acoustics!
I used to work nights, and found that some basic earplugs did the trick for me. Beyond that, there’s always something that can be done in a room to help absorb or block sound.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post:

Sign Off

© Acoustics By Design